
Quick Summary
- Forty years after surviving poisoned pills, the Tylenol brand now faces a modern crisis: viral claims linking prenatal acetaminophen use to autism.
- Political voices with massive followings helped amplify these claims, though they lack scientific support.
- Social media platforms like X, TikTok, and Facebook now spread health misinformation faster than facts.
- Companies in crisis can no longer rely on traditional PR strategies to maintain trust in their brand.
A Tale of Two Crises
In 1982, Johnson & Johnson faced one of the most terrifying product crises in modern history, when seven people died after ingesting cyanide-laced Tylenol capsules. The company acted quickly, recalling 31 million bottles, introducing tamper-proof packaging, and restoring public trust.
The response is still studied today as a model of effective crisis management.
While the 1982 crisis was a physical threat requiring a product recall, today’s Tylenol challenge is different and harder to fight.
Members of the Trump administration, including Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., have announced that prenatal acetaminophen can cause autism. These claims are based on an unproven link, yet they’ve gained traction across X, TikTok, Facebook parenting groups, and wellness influencer circles.
The publicity is causing a major headache for Kenvue, the company that spun off from Johnson & Johnson in 2023 and is responsible for the brand today.
Here’s what’s happening, and best practices for how Tylenol can respond.
What Does the Science Say?
To be clear, several studies have associated acetaminophen with autism, but none have proved that it causes it. A simple explanation could be that many pregnant women take the medication because it’s the only pain reliever that’s considered safe in pregnancy.
It makes logical sense that many mothers of autistic children have taken acetaminophen while pregnant.
More importantly, the most recent, high-quality studies have found no link at all. But that’s not the message that’s circulating on social media.
Decades of research have found that acetaminophen is safe for children when administered as recommended. – American Academy of Pediatrics
Defining the New Threat: Misinformation at Scale
Unlike the cyanide murders, the current crisis does not involve a physical product issue. The product is safe, and the science hasn’t changed.
What has changed is the public conversation.
The autism claims appeal to fear. They resonate emotionally with a highly vulnerable audience: expectant mothers. And once that fear enters the feed, it multiplies quickly, despite reassurance from credible medical organizations.
The Chilling Effect
“When I heard that [Trump] said that acetaminophen was the cause, I was a little scared and a little sad because, as the mom of a child with autism I felt like maybe I was being blamed for that.” – Rachel Deaton via AP News
As a result of the announcement from a source many people trust, mothers feel trapped. Do they manage pain and fever—both of which can pose serious risks to mother and baby during pregnancy—and risk guilt if their child is born with autism? Or “tough it out,” as Trump advised, to avoid future regret?
Because this is an emotional decision rather than a rational one, it’s harder to fight.
Why This Crisis Is Different
Lack of centralized gatekeepers
In 1982, brands could rely on centralized media. Today, everyone with a smartphone is a publisher. The narrative is decentralized, fragmented, and impossible to contain once it spreads.
Social media accelerates and amplifies
False claims move faster than corrections. Algorithms reward emotion over evidence. By the time a brand responds, misinformation has already hardened into belief.
People look to peers for credibility
A mommy blogger saying, “I stopped using Tylenol, just in case,” can carry more persuasive weight than a CDC fact sheet.
Mistrust is the default
After decades of medical scandals, vaccine hesitancy, and polarization, many audiences now assume pharmaceutical companies are hiding something—even when they aren’t.
Doctor challenges Trump administration’s claims about acetaminophen and autism
Strategic Shifts for a New Type of Crisis
To manage this type of brand threat, companies like Kenvue must rethink how they communicate in a misinformation-rich environment.
Speed over perfection
In the social age, response time is measured in minutes, not days. Brands must empower real-time response teams with pre-approved messaging.
Proxy voices over corporate spokespeople
Moms don’t want to hear from pharma execs. They want to hear from OB-GYNs, doulas, pediatricians, and fellow parents they trust.
Preemptive content strategy
Rather than reacting to each false claim, Kenvue could create authoritative, easy-to-understand content that answers common questions about pregnancy-safe medications.
Platform-specific messaging
One message doesn’t fit all. TikTok needs emotional storytelling. Reddit wants scientific transparency. Facebook groups crave community reassurance. Format and tone must shift by channel.
Algorithmic literacy
It’s not just what you say; it’s how you distribute it. Kenvue needs growth hackers who understand how to make science go viral.
Rebuild trust from a deficit
This isn’t 1982. Today’s consumers are skeptical by default. Brands need to earn trust the hard way: through consistency, transparency, and empathy over time.
“We believe independent, sound science clearly shows that taking acetaminophen does not cause autism. We strongly disagree with any suggestion otherwise and are deeply concerned about the health risks and confusion this poses for expecting mothers and parents.” – Kenvue reaction, 9/22/25
Execution Tactics for Misinformation Response
The strategic shifts set the tone. Here’s how Kenvue could act on them in practical terms.
Embed in parenting communities
Don’t broadcast—join the conversation. Comment, engage, and answer questions in Facebook groups, Reddit threads, and niche forums.
Lead with empathy
Messages like “We understand your concern. That’s why we asked the doctors…” open minds better than “There’s no evidence for that claim.”
Create micro-content built for social feeds
This means 30-second videos, myth-busting carousels, influencer collabs, and FAQs. Short, scroll-stopping content that’s easy to share.
Equip trusted influencers
Help OB-GYNs, nurse creators, and parenting bloggers share accurate, emotionally grounded messages in their own voice.
Set up real-time monitoring
Track misinformation trends as they emerge. Have a rapid response plan for each platform, tone, and audience.

A Different Kind of Poison
In 1982, Johnson & Johnson saved Tylenol by putting customer safety above profit. They changed packaging and pioneered a new model for brand integrity.
Today, Tylenol faces a different kind of poison: the social media feed and political polarization.
This time, they must protect consumers not just from harm but from fear. That requires boldness, creativity, and a total rethinking of how brands communicate trust.
If they get it right, they won’t just protect their reputation. They’ll set the new standard for how to fight misinformation—with truth, empathy, and speed.

Marketer Takeaways
- Meet audiences where they are. Social media platforms require tailored, platform-native responses.
- Respond fast. Quick, good messaging beats slow, perfect messaging in a viral crisis.
- Use trusted messengers. Influencers and experts are more credible than brand spokespeople.
- Lead with empathy. Acknowledge concerns before presenting facts.
- Adapt by channel. Each platform demands its own voice and format.
- Engage directly. Participating in conversations builds more trust than one-way statements.
- Educate proactively. Shareable content can prevent misinformation before it spreads.
- Monitor the narrative. Brand safety now includes tracking stories, not just products.
Media Shower’s AI marketing platform helps companies make trust their most valuable brand asset. Click here for a free trial.